Jump to content

Simony

From Wiki Knights Errant Life

Template:Short description Template:Other uses Template:Use dmy dates Template:Political corruption sidebar Template:Canon law

Simony (Template:IPAc-en) is the act of selling church offices and roles or sacred things. It is named after Simon Magus,[1] who is described in the Acts of the Apostles as having offered two disciples of Jesus payment in exchange for their empowering him to impart the power of the Holy Spirit to anyone on whom he would place his hands.[2] The term extends to other forms of trafficking for money in "spiritual things".Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Origin

The earliest church legislation against simony may be that of the forty-eighth canon of the Synod of Elvira (Template:Circa), against the practice of making a donation following a baptism.[3]Template:Rp

Following the Edict of Milan (313), the increased power and wealth of the church hierarchy attracted simony.[3]Template:Rp There are several accusations of simony (not by that name) against Arians, from Athanasius of Alexandria, Hilary of Poitiers, Pope Liberius and Gregory of Nazianzus.[3]Template:Rp Many Church Fathers, such as Ambrose, spoke out against the selling of ministries.[3]Template:Rp

Anti-simony provisions in Church Council canons (and papal bulls) became common: the First Council of Nicaea, the Synod of Antioch (341), and the Councils of Serdica (343–344), Chalcedon, and Orléans (533), etc.[3]Template:Rp

The purchase or sale of ecclesiastical office was associated with the figure of Simon Magus in the Acts of the Apostles and his name came into use as a term.[2] Important in popularizing the word 'Simony' was Pope Gregory I (590–604), who called such exchanges the "simoniac heresy".[4]

In the Middle Ages

Although considered a serious offense against canon law, simony is thought to have become widespread in the Catholic Church during the 9th and 10th centuries.[5] In the eleventh century, it was the focus of a great deal of debate.[6] Central to this debate was the validity of simoniacal orders: that is, whether a cleric who had obtained their office through simony was validly ordained.[7]

The Template:Lang, the Template:Lang[8] and the Decretals of Gregory IX[9] all dealt with the subject. The offender, whether Template:Lang (the perpetrator of a simoniacal transaction) or Template:Lang (the beneficiary of a simoniacal transaction), was liable to deprivation of his benefice and deposition from orders if a secular priest, or to confinement in a stricter monastery if a regular. No distinction seems to have been drawn between the sale of an immediate and of a reversionary interest. The innocent Template:Lang was, apart from dispensation, liable to the same penalties as though he were guilty.Template:SfnTemplate:Clarify

In 1494, a member of the Carmelite order, Adam of Genoa, was found murdered in his bed with twenty wounds after preaching against the practice of simony.[10]

In literature

File:DvinfernoPopeNicholasIII m.jpg
Dante speaks to Pope Nicholas III, committed to the Inferno for his simony, in Gustave Doré's 1861 wood engraving (portrait of the Third Bolgia of the Eighth Circle of Hell)

In the 14th century, Dante Alighieri depicted the punishment of many "clergymen, and popes and cardinals" in hell for being avaricious or miserly.[11]

He also criticised certain popes and other simoniacs:[12]

Template:Poemquote

In the Catholic Church

Simony remains prohibited in Roman Catholic canon law. In the Code of Canon Law, Canon 149.3 notes that "Provision of an office made as a result of simony is invalid by the law itself."[13]

Church of England

The Church of England struggled with the practice after its separation from Rome. For the purposes of English law, simony is defined by William Blackstone as "obtain[ing] orders, or a licence to preach, by money or corrupt practices"[14] or, more narrowly, "the corrupt presentation of any one to an ecclesiastical benefice for gift or reward".[15] While English law recognized simony as an offence,[16] it treated it as merely an ecclesiastical matter, rather than a crime, for which the punishment was forfeiture of the office or any advantage from the offence and severance of any patronage relationship with the person who bestowed the office. Both Edward VI and Elizabeth I promulgated statutes against simony, in the latter case through the Simony Act 1588 (31 Eliz. 1. c. 6) and Simony Act 1688. The cases of Bishop of St. David's Thomas Watson in 1699Template:Sfn and of Dean of York William Cockburn in 1841 were particularly notable.[17]

By the Benefices Act 1892,Template:Which a person guilty of simony is guilty of an offence for which he may be proceeded against under the Clergy Discipline Act 1892 (55 & 56 Vict. c. 32). An innocent clerk is under no disability, as he might be by the canon law. Simony may be committed in three ways – in promotion to orders, in presentation to a benefice, and in resignation of a benefice. The common law (with which the canon law is incorporated, as far as it is not contrary to the common or statute law or the prerogative of the Crown) has been considerably modified by statute. Where no statute applies to the case, the doctrines of the canon law may still be of authority.Template:Sfn

Template:As of, simony remains an offence.[18]Template:Better source needed An unlawfully bestowed office can be declared void by the Crown, and the offender can be disabled from making future appointments and fined up to £1,000.[19] Clergy are no longer required to make a declaration as to simony on ordination, but offences are now likely to be dealt with under the Clergy Discipline Measure 2003 (No. 3).[20]Template:Full citation needed[21]

See also

Citations

Template:Reflist

General and cited references

Attribution:

Further reading

External links

Template:Wiktionary

Template:Authority controlTemplate:Investiture Controversy

  1. The Reader's Encyclopedia (1965), New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, vol.2, p.932, "Simon."
  2. 2.0 2.1 Template:Bibleverse
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Template:Cite book
  4. Template:Cite book
  5. Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions, edited by Wendy Doniger, 1999
  6. Template:Cite journal
  7. Template:Cite journal
  8. Template:Harvnb cites Pt. ii. cause i. quest. 3
  9. Template:Harvnb cites Bk. v. tit. 3.
  10. Template:Cite book
  11. Inferno, Canto VII, line 47, Mandelbaum translation.
  12. Inferno, Canto XIX, lines 2–6, Mandelbaum translation
  13. Template:Cite web
  14. Template:Cite book
  15. Template:Cite book
  16. 3 Coke's Institutes 153–156
  17. The Times, 10 April 1841, p. 6 col.b, reprinted from the Cambridge Advertiser
  18. Template:Harvnb
  19. Simony Act 1588, s.4
  20. 2003 No. 3
  21. r.8.Template:Harvnb